ThirdParty: Update included gtest

third-party/googletest-master/googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-nice-strict.h

@@ -60,20 +60,91 @@
 
 // GOOGLETEST_CM0002 DO NOT DELETE
 
-#ifndef GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
-#define GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
+#ifndef GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
+#define GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
+
+#include <type_traits>
 
 #include "gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h"
 #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h"
 
 namespace testing {
+template <class MockClass>
+class NiceMock;
+template <class MockClass>
+class NaggyMock;
+template <class MockClass>
+class StrictMock;
+
+namespace internal {
+template <typename T>
+std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NiceMock<T>&);
+template <typename T>
+std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NaggyMock<T>&);
+template <typename T>
+std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const StrictMock<T>&);
+std::false_type StrictnessModifierProbe(...);
+
+template <typename T>
+constexpr bool HasStrictnessModifier() {
+  return decltype(StrictnessModifierProbe(std::declval<const T&>()))::value;
+}
+
+// Base classes that register and deregister with testing::Mock to alter the
+// default behavior around uninteresting calls. Inheriting from one of these
+// classes first and then MockClass ensures the MockClass constructor is run
+// after registration, and that the MockClass destructor runs before
+// deregistration. This guarantees that MockClass's constructor and destructor
+// run with the same level of strictness as its instance methods.
+
+#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW && \
+    (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__clang__))
+// We need to mark these classes with this declspec to ensure that
+// the empty base class optimization is performed.
+#define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS __declspec(empty_bases)
+#else
+#define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
+#endif
+
+template <typename Base>
+class NiceMockImpl {
+ public:
+  NiceMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+  ~NiceMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
+template <typename Base>
+class NaggyMockImpl {
+ public:
+  NaggyMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+  ~NaggyMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
+template <typename Base>
+class StrictMockImpl {
+ public:
+  StrictMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(this); }
+
+  ~StrictMockImpl() { ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(this); }
+};
+
+}  // namespace internal
 
 template <class MockClass>
-class NiceMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NiceMock
+    : private internal::NiceMockImpl<MockClass>,
+      public MockClass {
  public:
+  static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
+                "Can't apply NiceMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
+                "strictness modifier. See "
+                "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
+                "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
   NiceMock() : MockClass() {
-    ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
   // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -85,21 +156,16 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
   // made explicit.
   template <typename A>
   explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
-    ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
-  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
-  NiceMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
-      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+  template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
+  NiceMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
                   std::forward<An>(args)...) {
-    ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
-  }
-
-  ~NiceMock() {  // NOLINT
-    ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
  private:
@@ -107,11 +173,19 @@ class NiceMock : public MockClass {
 };
 
 template <class MockClass>
-class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NaggyMock
+    : private internal::NaggyMockImpl<MockClass>,
+      public MockClass {
+  static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
+                "Can't apply NaggyMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
+                "strictness modifier. See "
+                "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
+                "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
+
  public:
   NaggyMock() : MockClass() {
-    ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
   // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -123,21 +197,16 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
   // made explicit.
   template <typename A>
   explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
-    ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
-  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
-  NaggyMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
-      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+  template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
+  NaggyMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
                   std::forward<An>(args)...) {
-    ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
-  }
-
-  ~NaggyMock() {  // NOLINT
-    ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
  private:
@@ -145,11 +214,19 @@ class NaggyMock : public MockClass {
 };
 
 template <class MockClass>
-class StrictMock : public MockClass {
+class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS StrictMock
+    : private internal::StrictMockImpl<MockClass>,
+      public MockClass {
  public:
+  static_assert(
+      !internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
+      "Can't apply StrictMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
+      "strictness modifier. See "
+      "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
+      "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
   StrictMock() : MockClass() {
-    ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
   // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
@@ -161,55 +238,24 @@ class StrictMock : public MockClass {
   // made explicit.
   template <typename A>
   explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
-    ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
-  template <typename A1, typename A2, typename... An>
-  StrictMock(A1&& arg1, A2&& arg2, An&&... args)
-      : MockClass(std::forward<A1>(arg1), std::forward<A2>(arg2),
+  template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
+  StrictMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
+      : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
                   std::forward<An>(args)...) {
-    ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
-  }
-
-  ~StrictMock() {  // NOLINT
-    ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(
-        internal::ImplicitCast_<MockClass*>(this));
+    static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
+                  "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
   }
 
  private:
   GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(StrictMock);
 };
 
-// The following specializations catch some (relatively more common)
-// user errors of nesting nice and strict mocks.  They do NOT catch
-// all possible errors.
-
-// These specializations are declared but not defined, as NiceMock,
-// NaggyMock, and StrictMock cannot be nested.
-
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NiceMock<NiceMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NiceMock<NaggyMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NiceMock<StrictMock<MockClass> >;
-
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NaggyMock<NiceMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NaggyMock<NaggyMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class NaggyMock<StrictMock<MockClass> >;
-
-template <typename MockClass>
-class StrictMock<NiceMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class StrictMock<NaggyMock<MockClass> >;
-template <typename MockClass>
-class StrictMock<StrictMock<MockClass> >;
+#undef GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
 
 }  // namespace testing
 
-#endif  // GMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
+#endif  // GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_